The House of Commons Education Select Committee release their report into School Sport on Monday 22nd July. The report "School Sport after 2012 - no more political football" has largey been welcomed.

The education select committee said that the £150m plan, unveiled earlier this year following an avalanche of criticism about a decision to axe a £162m network of national school sport partnerships, was inadequate on its own and concluded further measures were needed to ensure the legacy from the Games benefitted all children.

"Successive governments have kicked school sport around as a political football, announcing short-term fixes without any sustained vision for the future," said committee chair Graham Stuart.

"Occasional pump-priming is simply not good enough for something so important. If the government want to capitalise on the legacy of London 2012 it must commit to programmes and funding for the long-term."

Last week, former London 2012 organising committee chairman turned government legacy ambassador Lord Coe admitted to regret that the debate over school sport became "tribal" during the Games.

Following a furious backlash against the decision of education secretary Michael Gove in December 2010 to cut the £162m national network introduced by Labour, the new primary school focused scheme was announced in March this year

It is funded jointly by the department of culture, media and sport, the department for education and the department for health.

Ringfenced for two years, it awards an average of £9,250 to each school to spend on sport-related activities but there are fears that without sufficient guidance or assistance in spending the money, it will be wasted.

"We are concerned that the government's primary sport premium — while correctly focussed — is only being given to schools for two years. This is simply not long enough for schools to build a sustained provision," said Stuart.

"Many head teachers will be struggling to decide how to spend the money most effectively and, if the funding is not extended, there is a risk the primary sport premium will become little more than a gimmick."

Shadow sports minister Clive Efford said the committee's conclusions showed that the government had spent the past two years "going backwards". Shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg said that the government had failed to create a legacy for school sport.

"This government needs to take school sport seriously – they should start with restoring Labour's requirement that all pupils do a minimum of two hours of sport a week," he said.

But the government argues that its new school curriculum will ensure that all pupils take part in competitive school sport and says it has committed to ensuring that more primary schools have specialist PE teachers and that all teachers understand its importance.

One of the key problems is that too few primary school teachers feel confident teaching PE and children fail to develop a love of sport or the required levels of physical literacy to enjoy it.

"Our vision for school sport is long term — on top of the £300 million that will go directly to schools to spend on PE over the next two years we have asked Ofsted to hold schools to account for how they well they spend the money," said a DfE spokeswoman.

"In addition, the new PE curriculum will put competitive sport back at the heart of school life and end the damaging 'prizes for all' culture. Our reforms will ensure every child is given the opportunities they need to be fit, healthy and to excel at sport."

But the committee said it was important not to focus solely on competitive sport and for schools to offer a range of activities.

"We need to be encouraging all young people to take part in sport; whether they enjoy the competition of football, rugby or netball or prefer non-competitive activities. Schools must provide a range of activities that appeal to all," said Stuart.